What would a netroots-based think tank look like?

A lot of the netroots has been oriented toward activating the citizenry, fundraising, and getting out the vote, it seems like.  What I am more interested in, and what I feel is missing, is a netroots component to....whatever it is think tanks do, the intellectual and academic policy wonk stuff.

There are two types of netroots-affiliated think tanks whose idea I would like to explore.

The first is a think tank whose goal is to provide data that shows why the netroots are important.  Things that it could do include sponsoring academic conferences on blogging or doing detailed demographic studies of netroots.

The second is a think tank that produces information in collaboration with the netroots.  This is something a bit harder to do, especially since a good portion of netroots (and of the American public in general) are unqualified for this sort of intellectual gruntwork.  Not everyone is a scholar.

There's a difference between the netroots trying to push our elected representatives in the correct direction and working to craft the details of an agenda that can't be properly described without 100-page papers.

Take the net neutrality debate as an example.  It's fairly easy to say that we want X, Y, and Z taken care of, but has anyone with netroots connections actually put together data and written papers that would be useful in drafting net neutrality legislation, even writing sample legislation?  I think that is wrong to say that that is solely the job of politicians and that we need to elect the right kinds of politicians.

One idea that I had was using the many politically activated university students to do a lot of the legwork, reading political science journals and books, and writing article/book summaries and reviews that pass along information that might be of use to netroots and activists.  For example, I just read a book that included a claim that blacks are low-information voters relative to whites on national issues, but can be high-information voters relative to whites on local issues.  That strikes me as potentially useful information that could cause me to reevaluate some of the things posted by Chris Bowers about local Philadelphia elections.  There are more numbers to crunch than the stuff put out by the various polling outfits like Gallup and Rasmussen.  By putting this info into one place for some of the netroots to peruse, some of us may connect the dots and come up with new ideas about how to persuade people on progressive politics.

Does this at all sound useful?  Can anyone come up with another imagining of what a netroots think tank might look like?



Display:


Re: What would a netroots-based think tank look li (none / 0)

This is a great idea.

I think you overestimate what it takes to be "qualified" to do such work.  I know a number of people who work for think tanks who have nothing more than a BA.  Intelligence, diligence, and a desire to produce good work is far more important than any kind of formal academic training.

While it certainly wouldn't hurt to have people with the necessary letters following their names, I think the strength of the netroots is precisely that it contains hundreds or thousands of people qualified to speak on a particular subject with which they are intimately familiar who might otherwise not have an outlet.  It's always fascinating to read people with a deep and thorough knowledge of a subject when it happens spontaneously on MyDD threads - it would be fantastic if there were a forum in which such expertise could get a formalized expression.

As I said, having some people with the good credentials would be important to giving everything a veneer of respectability, but it's not like there aren't a lot of professors, political elites, etc. who frequent these parts.  


by Baldrick on Tue May 29, 2007 at 05:43:58 PM EST

Re: What would a netroots-based think tank look li (none / 0)

I always get the impression that some of netroots have less than a BA in terms of education.  I'm also wondering how many people have an understanding of polling data that goes beyond knowing what crosstabs are, although I am sure people can learn.

Obviously, there are people who can produce work despite formal academic training, but at the same time I feel that there needs to be some of those people who do have the training because I'm hoping to cross-pollinate ideas rather than set up an alternative information apparatus.


Things You Don't Talk About in Polite Company: Religion, Politics, the Occasional Intersection of Both
by Anthony de Jesus on Wed May 30, 2007 at 05:16:58 AM EST
[ Parent ]


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.